diff options
| author | awuctl | 2022-01-21 08:19:31 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub | 2022-01-21 08:19:31 +0000 |
| commit | e5ab74c2d9c6aa641d60df0769f42f54e3e8ea13 (patch) | |
| tree | 3373aa304fbbbde085d7c3cf3b4d2ad00b5c0184 | |
| parent | 9f355ce1c4c5f2d45104436c8ad2e77366dddb9a (diff) | |
| download | activation-e5ab74c2d9c6aa641d60df0769f42f54e3e8ea13.zip | |
Fix NSLP description
Made an oopsie - NSLP is definitely not "an SLP equivalent" as the activation is not authorized by the OEM.
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 7 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -69,10 +69,9 @@ There are multiple types of keys that will accompany OEM licenses. Those are: The differences between them are pretty extreme but ultimately do not matter that much. In short, **SLP** keys do not require Microsoft's activation servers to activate - the OEM marks a machine as activated during manufacturing, -**DM** are the "BIOS keys" you might have seen/heard about and **NSLP**s are the -**SLP** equivalent for when the OEM doesn't want to bother with activation -during manufacturing. In terms more people might understand, NSLP is analogous -to COA. +**DM** are the "BIOS keys" you might have seen/heard about and **NSLP**s are for +when the OEM doesn't want to bother with activation during manufacturing. In +terms more people might understand, NSLP is analogous to COA. ### Volume Licensing Microsoft's bigger customers that "need" more licenses for more computer can opt |
