Fix NSLP description
Made an oopsie - NSLP is definitely not "an SLP equivalent" as the activation is not authorized by the OEM.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f355ce1c4
commit
e5ab74c2d9
@ -69,10 +69,9 @@ There are multiple types of keys that will accompany OEM licenses. Those are:
|
|||||||
The differences between them are pretty extreme but ultimately do not matter
|
The differences between them are pretty extreme but ultimately do not matter
|
||||||
that much. In short, **SLP** keys do not require Microsoft's activation servers
|
that much. In short, **SLP** keys do not require Microsoft's activation servers
|
||||||
to activate - the OEM marks a machine as activated during manufacturing,
|
to activate - the OEM marks a machine as activated during manufacturing,
|
||||||
**DM** are the "BIOS keys" you might have seen/heard about and **NSLP**s are the
|
**DM** are the "BIOS keys" you might have seen/heard about and **NSLP**s are for
|
||||||
**SLP** equivalent for when the OEM doesn't want to bother with activation
|
when the OEM doesn't want to bother with activation during manufacturing. In
|
||||||
during manufacturing. In terms more people might understand, NSLP is analogous
|
terms more people might understand, NSLP is analogous to COA.
|
||||||
to COA.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Volume Licensing
|
### Volume Licensing
|
||||||
Microsoft's bigger customers that "need" more licenses for more computer can opt
|
Microsoft's bigger customers that "need" more licenses for more computer can opt
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user